03 August 2020

Teaching in the time of COVID (with thanks to Gabriel García Márquez*)

Our school broke up for the August holiday on Friday. For a blogger, it follows ipso facto that this is the perfect time for some introspection on what the past four months have been like.

In a nutshell: It fundamentally changed me as an educator.

There are so many things to consider. In this article, I am only going to focus on one: the social and emotional impact it has had on our staff, students and parents.

Some context: I am the head of an independent school in the South of Johannesburg. Our fees are similar to those of some state schools ("ex model C") but much lower than the top, traditional independent schools.

After the first lock-down at the end of March, we, like many other schools across the world, focused on doing the one thing that the techno-sceptics have told us for the past decade was not possible: shifting learning and teaching online. And, like thousands of teachers across the world, our teachers delivered this brilliantly in almost no time. We used Google Classroom and that was pretty much it. Free whiteboard apps where we could find them. Zoom in very small chunks of time.

Our school, teachers and the majority of our students do not have the money to pay for lots of data. Most of the students and teachers only have access to mobile data in very limited amounts. (Having said that, we still had more access to data than the majority of rural South African students and teachers do.) But we got the job done. Teachers had to redesign curriculum and delivery on the fly. And they did. By working incredibly long hours and going the extra mile to support their students. But that is the topic of another article.

Then the reopening debate started.

And the amount of uninformed pontificating just exploded.

We are teachers. We know that kids should be in school. We prefer to teach them face-to-face because we know that relationships matter. We also know that, even though we managed to continue teaching, those students preparing for exit exams need more on-site support. We want them back in class as soon as possible. Most of us are also parents. And we know that having your children stuck at home is not good for them (or us!). 

Like all South African schools, we opened up and like most independent schools, we opened up for more Grades than initially allowed because we had the space and ability to do so. 

But please, be careful with your certainties around the reopening of schools if you have not spent a year in a classroom.

The prompt for this blog came from one of my heroes, Max du Preez. When I was a student, Max started Die Vrye Weekblad (now resurrected in digital format). They held up a blinding spotlight to the atrocities of the final years of the Apartheid government in South Africa. I respect Max's opinions greatly. But he posted this and I realised again that we all have our blind spots:

To me, this tweet shows how deeply disconnected even well-informed people are to the daily reality of standing in a classroom in South Africa (and most of the world). It goes without saying that any person who ventures outside of their house to go to work would be at greater risk of contracting the virus than they would if they stayed at home. 

But when it comes to measuring the risk and the impact on children and the community, we at least need to understand the kinds of interactions that we are talking about. Having been part of this debate from the inside, I can assure you that this one is fraught with complexity and anxiety from school leaders, school owners (in the case of independent schools), parents, teachers, and students. What is the appropriate cost/risk factor, if we want to use business-speak?

As is often the case, a full appreciation of context is critical. I am heading a school that is part of a group of schools. And even for our schools inside our group, we had to make allowances for differences in context.

Firstly, are we talking about pre-school, primary or secondary? Each one of these phases has different operational realities that need to be accounted for. For example, in a primary space, most subjects are taught to a class as a whole and, in the lower grades at least, one teacher will cover all subject areas with that class. In the secondary space, especially in senior grades, you have multiple subjects being taught to multiple classes at the same time. A very different logistical space to manage.

But, more importantly in our country, there is the socio-economic space. We are all acutely aware of the vast disparities in our society. We are still dealing with Thabo Mbeki's "Two Economies". 

When you consider the realities presented by this photograph on the left, are you assuming that all schools must open, regardless?


Image 2: Source: Business Insider









 
Are we to assume that children and teachers in this school on the right (Image 3) will be as safe from transmission as those working in a school serving the left of the Image 2?
 
   Image 3: Source: Mail & Guardian














Even in this relatively well-resourced school above (Image 4), carefully observe the spacing. Remember that this teacher will be in this closed space with these children for at least six hours every day. Anybody who has spent a year in a classroom will tell you what happens during flu season in any school. 

Note the cartoon below (Image 5). While funny, any teacher will tell you that there is a lot of truth in this. (And also note that there are only six children depicted!)
                    Image 5
                                                           

All of which then leads to Scooby and team trying to find substitute teachers to look after those classes now without teachers. And, from personal experience, I can tell you that doing substitution when teachers are absent is an incredibly difficult and complex task to manage. The children will arrive, and if there is no one to manage them, they will fool around. They are children, after all, not passive little units of DNA waiting to be manipulated on a checkerboard when we can find the time.

Now, when the reopening of schools was announced, we were presented with volumes of documentation with advice and instructions on how this should be approached. None of which you will now find on the Department of Basic Education (DBE) website here. Although I do still have two PDF documents shared with us earlier: DBE1 and DBE2. In these documents you will notice requirements around social distancing and the need to be able to trace student movement and contacts that clearly did not have any relationship with the reality of the vast majority of schools in this country. Not even within the relatively privileged space that my school inhabits.

Let's return to Image 2 above. My wife teaches at a school that services only the ultra privileged, wealthy people represented by the left of that picture. My school serves a cross-section of students and parents from mostly the grey area in between those two worlds as well as some people from the edges of the two extremes.

When my wife's school reopened, they had almost 100% attendance across the board and that was sustained all through the term. When my school reopened, we started with around 60% attendance and, as the number of cases in Gauteng rose, that figure steadily dropped towards the end of the term.

Why?

Imagine you wake up in a comfortable house on the left of Image 2. It is only you and your own immediate family in the house, situated in a garden behind gates. When you drive your children to school it is to one of those depicted in the masthead of Nic Spaull's article here in the Daily Maverick with enough space and students sitting quietly in their desks. Nothing really to worry about.

But if you wake up in an RDP home or shack or overcrowded flat represented by the right of Image 2, things look very different. You are probably sharing that space with elderly relatives who are extremely vulnerable, you look out your window and you see a crowded street with little or no social distancing happening. Your kids must take public transport to get to school. You must take public transport to get to work. None of the COVID-regulations will be enforced. Some of the teachers at my school must take six taxis to get to and from work every day. Then spend their days as depicted above and return to their own families.

And even this is a simplification because I have had parents from both sides of the divide wanting their kids to stay at home (or come to school).

I spent many hours over the past months only dealing with the anxieties of parents and teachers trying to address their fear of what would happen to them and their families should they or their children be infected. Anxieties supported by the ever-changing picture of how the disease is spread to others by children. Anxieties of parents needing to weigh up academic progress vs safety.

But, in the South African context and Max's tweet and stated explicitly by Nic Spaull in his article, I believe that at the heart of the sometimes cynical view of teacher's concerns about returning to work lies not only a blind spot for what happens on a daily basis in schools, but also a level of anger and exasperation with our biggest Teachers' Union, SADTU. And this is perfectly understandable. SADTU has a terrible track record for supporting mediocrity in education and actively undermining any efforts to improve teaching. However, it is worth noting that almost all the teacher's unions support SADTU in their call for caution on school reopening because they know the dire state that most schools are in. Just because SADTU is usually wrong doesn't imply that they are always wrong.

My plea is for some level of real engagement with the people in schools every day when making your arguments for the blanket reopening of schools. Every point in Spaull's article has merit. But his cost/risk analysis suffers from a lack of context. What will the real cost of an acceleration of cases be should schools reopen under their current constraints with no real support in manpower in order to facilitate the level of control required to avoid the spread of the disease? Do we really understand the dynamics of schools in South Africa when we make pronouncements on how to interpret international research data on the spread of the disease in schools?


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _


3 comments:

  1. There is a lot of substance in your viewpoint and I appreciate this perspective. However, I would like to engage on what the possible solutions could be for South Africa at this moment ?

    Effective reflection was done in your article but I don’t think there is a “One size fits all” type of solution to this. It is clear there is lack of engagement and contextualized research but there is also a culture we need to avoid and that is to analyze the problem so much that we can’t seem to prioritize finding a solution. All children in each context matter and they are all equally deserving of a quality education however, how do we go about achieving that ?

    As a school principal, I believe that this crisis needs all stakeholders Parents, teachers and scholars working together to find normalcy in the chaos. We have great reasons and data to state what went wrong and why but I want to divert the conversation into finding a solution , research on how we can try and be solution focused.

    1. What would have worked if done differently?
    2. How do we ensure that different level of access is accommodated in the solution? - if we are not opening the schools then who gets to access learning resources and who doesn’t?

    3. How can we empower our Principals or head of schools to effectively be part of this conversation and openly share their perspectives? Do they have room or is the conversation for parents and DBE officials?

    3. If we are staying at home, how long is that and what does education look like after that ?

    4. What are your thoughts of the trimmed curriculum, how far can we trim it ? Which skills can we discard and which skills should we prioritize? And do we have the data to support this decision?

    I think we can argue for or against school opening all day but the challenge still remains: What is the solution ?

    Close schools indefinitely, and then what happens ? The same parents will be fighting school leaders by the end of the year wanting their scholars to be progressed to the next grade. Hence, we need to invest a lot of time in finding a solution.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Reply Part 1:
      Hi Gundo, thanks so much for your considered response! This is exactly why I wrote the post in the first place - to get school leaders and teachers to take part in a conversation that seemed to be monopolized by external voices.

      Your questions are all crucial and I certainly do not have all the answers. Some days I feel have no answers! You start to feel paralysed by all the variables.

      I will try to give my perspective on your questions. My assumption is that the opening of schools is first prize. One should also be realistic and assume that in no school will that be entirely risk-free. The million-dollar question is: "What is an acceptable level of risk?" I don't think there is a clear answer to that. Another question is, if we cannot reduce risk to "acceptable" levels, what is the price we are prepared to pay in lost academic time? Do we go the Kenyan route and shut down for the rest of the year because we believe the immediate risk to life is more important than the loss of one school year? Do we have enough information to make that calculation?

      But I am getting stuck in analysis paralysis again - sorry!

      To your questions:
      "1. What would have worked if done differently?" - I believe the initial lock-down and closure of schools was the right thing to do. What should have happened during that time was a far more aggressive, streamlined preparing of schools for the reopening. The basic plans were mostly good. However, the enormity of the task to fix decades of neglected infrastructure was just too great. Still, I believe with better coordination between the various state departments schools could have been better prepared as far as infrastructure was concerned. This could also (still) be the catalyst for fixing rural school infrastructure. Two things that I would do to support this is (1) while many builders and engineers are still not fully employed, run an intensive programme to fix classrooms and ablution facilities at schools and (2) coordinate with all PGCE courses to get student teachers to schools to support with social distancing and COVID protocols.

      (See Part 2 for the rest...)

      Delete
  2. Reply Part 2:
    "2. How do we ensure that different level of access is accommodated in the solution? - if we are not opening the schools then who gets to access learning resources and who doesn’t?" - Again, the scale of the logistical challenges here makes it almost impossible to find a single answer. To refer to Kenya again: They looked at this and decided that it could not be done and made the radical call to cancel the year. In SA, I think we should go for a multi-faceted solution. In my attempt at a response here I am going to include your question 4 in the process. (Also, my experience lies in the Secondary space, so I will focus on that for the most part): If we accept that schools cannot accommodate all the students on their grounds simultaneously for the foreseeable future, we have to prioritise. I don't think the morning/afternoon sessions are workable because most teachers teach across multiple grades - they cannot reasonably be expected to teach double shifts every day.
    It would make sense to initially focus on completing Grade 11 and 12 syllabi as far as possible and to prepare those students for exit (Grade 12) and final year (Grade 11). This way you minimise disruption for students who have been in the system the longest and ensure progression.
    Grades 8 - 10: A combination of rotational timetable (with most time allocated to Grade 10) and trimming curriculum. This is going to be unpopular with some, but these are unusual times: Remove LO for the rest of this year and for next year. In Grade 8, remove all subjects except for Languages, Maths and Science. These are the only subjects that require a continuous building of skills. In Grade 9, trim the curriculum for all subjects except Maths to absolutely core skills that is non-negotiable for progression to the next year. At this stage we don't need to cram content into kids - we need to try and focus on the skills that they will need to progress academically. (Even in Grade 9 subjects like History and Business can be dropped - it is perfectly possible to pick up these subject in Grade 10 without having done them previously. Not ideal, but possible). By doing this, you reduce the amount of time required for them to be on campus and they can come in maybe twice a week at most. It reduces the staffing requirements on a given day. It also reduces the amount of study material that will need to be made available to those who cannot come in or if a full closure should be required again. Other tools that are already being used that should be developed further is the use of television and radio - again, only for those core subjects.

    Progression: How do we determine progression for those lower grades not running a full school programme?
    - Exams only in the core subjects and based on a reduced curriculum. Students must pass those to progress. These exams and reduced curricula must be centrally set for all state schools.
    Added to this, we will have to redesign curriculum and the school year for the next two (maybe three) years to allow for essential catch-up.

    Given where we are in the year already and given the challenges faced by especially rural schools, we will also have to develop policy for those cases where none of the above can be implemented.
    1. Students who find themselves in a position where they have to repeat a year due to there being no teaching because of COVID, must be subsidised to ensure that cost is not a factor.
    2. School staffing and infrastructure: Planning will have to be put in place to accommodate a potential "bubble" due to a larger number of students potentially repeating a year. Again, if done well, this could be used as an opportunity to address long-standing infrastructure issues creatively.

    I am going to stop there for now. This could go on forever, and I might be completely on the wrong track! Please share your thoughts?

    ReplyDelete